This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 1973–1984, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.213
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: (a) Schematic representation of the vicinal σC−H→σ*C−X interaction by double-bond/no-bond resonance...
Figure 2: Schematic representation of stereoelectronic effects (a) hyperconjugation, (b) homohyperconjugation...
Figure 3: Schematic representation of possible homoanomeric interactions in six-membered saturated heterocycl...
Figure 4: Structure of compounds 1 to 8.
Scheme 1: Proposed reaction mechanism for the synthesis of piperidones by the Mannich reaction. The substitue...
Scheme 2: For 6, R1 = R2 = H, for 7, R1 = H, R2 = CH3, for 8, R1 = R2 = CH3.
Figure 5: (a) Favored conformation for compound 1, determined by nOe effect, (b) t-ROESY spectrum of 1 record...
Figure 6: (a) Preferred conformation of 4 determined by nOe, (b) t-ROESY spectrum of 4 recorded at 500 MHz in...
Figure 7: (a) ORTEP diagram of 1. The thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level for all atoms...
Figure 8: (a) ORTEP diagrams of 6 and 7. The thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level for al...
Figure 9: (a) 1JC,H coupling constant of 3, 5, 6, and 8. (b) Plot of the population analysis versus 1JC,H (sl...
Scheme 3: Representation of the nN→σ*C–H(7)eq interaction. The interaction energy is 0.55 kcal/mol at the ωB9...
Figure 10: Distances between N(3) and C(7) for 3, 5, 6, and 7 measured in the structures obtained by XRD.